There were, according to Edward Hilton 2,994 people at the start of the siege -
130 British and Native Officers
740 British Troops
700 Native Troops
150 Civilian Volunteers
237 Women
260 Children
50 Boys of La Martinere
27 non-combatant Europeans
700 non-combatant Natives *
The siege was not altogether an English one and to think thus is completely untrue and terribly unjust. As
the English on the whole did not even list the names of their own foot
soldiers so they did not mention the
brave Indians who stayed loyal to them during the siege. A look at some of the
memorials gives a better and a slightly more honest picture:
13th BENGAL
NATIVE INFANTRY.
Inscription:
—Erected
in memory of the devoted gallantry and fidelity of the Native Officers and Sepoys
of the Hon'ble Company's 13th Bengal Native Infantry (Garud-ka- Fultan), who
fell during the defence of Lucknow. This monument is erected by the surviving
European officers of the Regiment in the Baillie Guard Post, which was held by
the regiment throughout the defence. Subadar Doondayal Pandey, Subadar Ram
Pershad and Subadar Sheo Charan Singh, Jamadar Bhawani Bux Chowbe, Kalka
Tewari, 9 Havildars, 8 Naiks, 5 Drummers, 24 Sepoys.
(As a reward every member of the
three faithful regiments (13th, 48th and 71st) were formed into a new
regiment — the present 16th Rajputs (the Lucknow Regiment). In the end 1
Subadar Major received the 1st class, 11 Bubadars the 2nd class of the
Order of Merit. 16 Havildars were promoted to Jamadars of whom 2 also got
the 2nd Class of the Order. 23 Naiks were promoted to Havildars, and 55 sepoys
to Naiks; drummers and other followers received three months' pay. One
Naik was promoted to Subadar with the 2nd Class of the Order, and 3 Naiks
and 3 Sepoys to Jamadars in the Cawnpore Levy.)
NATIVE OFFICERS AND SEPOYS.
Inscription:
— To the memory of the Native Officers and Sepoys of the 13th Native
Infantry, 41st Native Infantry, 48th Native Infantry, 71st
Native Infantry, the Oudh Irregular Force, Native Pensioners, New Native Levies,
Artillery, and Lucknow Magazine who died near this spot, nobly performing their
duty, this column is erected by Lord Northbrook, Viceroy and Governor-General
of India, 1875.
The 200 men of the 33rd
Native Infantry remained loyal through out the siege, performing their duty
with marked excellence at the exposed defences of the Baily Guard. As of the 1st
of July, there were 12 native officers, 28 non-commissioned officers, 13
drummers and 136 rank and file.
The figures on the 1st July 1857
were as follows, and apply to the 13th Native Infantry as to the
rest of the Indian soldiers:
41st Native Infantry.—
16 Drummers.
48th Native Infantry. —
5 Native Officers, 18 Havildars, 24 -Drummers, 26 rank and file.
71st Native Infantry. —
12 Native Officers, 14 Havildars, 11 Drummers, 7 rank and file.
Oudh Irregular Force.— 7
Native Officers, 17 Havildars, 79 rank and file.
Native pensioners. — 6
Native Officers, 3 Drummers, 109 rank and file.
New Native Levies.3
Native Officers, 1 Havildar, 44 rank and file.
Artillery. — 5 Native
Officers, 18 Havildars, 6 Drummers, 146 rank and file.
Lucknow Magazine. — 4 Havildars, 10
rank and file.
7th Light Cavalry. — 4
Native Officers, 2 Havildars, 4 rank and file
Total, with the 13th
Native Infantry.— 54 Native Officers, 102 Havildars, 73 Drummers, 618 rank and file, or 847 out of a total force of
1,698.
“To the
Memory of
The Native
Officers and Sepoys
Of the
13th Native
Infantry, 41st Native Infantry
48th Native
Infantry, 71st Native Infantry
The Oude
Irregular Force,
Native
Pensioners, New Native Levies
Artillery
and Lucknow Magazine
Who died
near this spot
Nobly
performing their duty.”
In the
following memorandum, (Appendix 3, Gubbins) Martin Gubbins charts the original
strength of the Lucknow Garrison, and includes a total of "its reduction
by Deaths, Desertations, etc., during the Siege."
Strength of the Garrison on the 1st of July:
927 Europeans
765 Natives
Total- 1692
Reduction during the Siege:
305 Europeans
133 Natives
230 Deserted
Total-713
Remaining Strength on the 29th of September, 1st Relief including sick and wounded:
577 Europeans
402 Natives
Total -979
Number of Officers killed and died in the Garrison from the 29th of June to the final relief by Colin Campbell:
41 Military
2 Civilian
1 Assistant Chaplain
5 Warren
Total -49
In Julia Inglis’ book, the following reckoning
is given:
EUROPEANS:
Artillery: 80
H.M.’s 32nd: 600
H.M.’s 84th: 50
730
NATIVE INFANTRY
Sikh Cavalry: 60
7th Light Cavalry
9
13th Native Infantry 250
48th Native Infantry 43
71st Native Infantry 117
479 =
1209
There is little mention of "other"
natives, that is, the servants, ayahs, water carriers and laborers who
remained in the entrenchments during the siege, except for this rather sad
accounting from Julia Inglis:
“Double
this number of natives had remained true to their salt, and never mutinied; but
it was not deemed advisable to keep them all, as they out numbered the European
portion of the garrison.”
If the above reckoning is correct, then there
are close to a 1000 people who remain nameless and I tend to trust the numbers of Hilton as being the most accurate. These discrepancies are probably the
greatest tragedy of the siege - the stories of the uncounted can never be told and they
remain, like the residency, ghosts of a dead age. I cannot do them justice in
this work, nor is it possible to resurrect their tales, however, I hope that
the visitors to the Residency today, will keep them in mind and spare a thought
for all the sacrifices that did not make it into the pages of any book.
The numbers above bear this out. By far not all the Anglo Indian families have been listed and very possibly many ordinary soldiers’ families are missing too. I recently came across Maggie McDonnough, the 12 year old daughter of an English sergeant of the 7st N.I. - Maggie died during the siege of a bullet wound to the head - her death is described in the Polehampton memoir but Maggie herself and her father do not appear on any of the roll calls which list the names of the original members of the Lucknow Garrison. Her mother is mentioned as Mrs. McDonnough only. Why Maggie was left out is a mystery.
Mrs. Harris mentions a few
servants by name and that only in passing – there is Chunia, a Madrasi her
husband employed during the siege to help in the household chores, “Scott” a wet nurse, and although she is
described as a “copper coloured
individual” this does not help in defining her in any detail (a soldier’s
wife perhaps) and Ramsay who Mrs. Harris
writes towards the end of her journal as
being “Mrs. D’s African servant”. As
Ramsay had attended both Mr. Polehampton and Charlie Dashwood during their
final illnesses, he was present for the entire siege. Ramsay makes a further appearance in Mr. Polehampton's journal (published after his death by his brothers), as Thomas Ramsay, "an African-Christian born at Boston" who had a good knowledge of English. Unfortunately, the reverend convinced himself the man was a spy as he had been late in attending his duties and came up with odd excuses for his tardiness. The real origins of Thomas Ramsay are unknown. There has been some talk on one forum that he was an American. The Polehamptons had two other men in their service, one is only called the Baboo and the other is Peter, "the native Christian Church Chuprassi". Mr. Gubbins had in his service an English maid named Chivers who is only mentioned briefly in his book.
As Mrs. Inglis writes:
"The servants who remained with us were our khansama, who acted as cook, Carruk and Quilbert, who took care of the boys, my ayah and her son, John's khidmadgar and four punkah coolies. Mrs. Case also had several servants so we were well off. The cook and his wife were the only ones who ran away, the others were outside the Residency when the siege commenced. Our bearer, an excellent servant, went out to try and bring in his wife, and could not get back again. Mrs. Case's ayah was at her house ill. Our syces (grooms) also remained faithful." Her husband's "soldier servant" Vokins, died during the siege following the amputation of his leg.
In some cases, though these omissions had less to do with an inability to count and more with
prejudices of race and rank which were common at the time. It can be taken for granted that the original
lists deal almost exclusively with Europeans, and to
add to that, Ladies and their Children, meaning the families of officers and
persons of higher status. The rather naive anecdote by Mrs. Harris in her
journal entry for June 19th, gives a good idea of what status and
rank meant:
“I went yesterday
evening with James to the Begum’s house to see the poor women who came in from
Seetapore, and gave them a few things of mine which I thought would be useful
as they had lost all their own clothes…They were very cheerful and seemed quite
to have got over their troubles. It is
wonderful how little that class of people seem to feel things that would almost
kill a lady.”
Rees makes a differentiation and lists European
Women and their Children (Mrs. Harris’ “that class of people”) so at least in his list of the garrison we can find some
Eurasian names and the families of the uncovenanted services.
An example of this is Mrs. Allnutt – in the
list of Rees, she is mentioned as having 4 children and having survived the
siege. However, in Wilson’s
list she only has one child and the child is dead. By the time we get to the Hilton s cemetery guide, Mrs. Allnutt and one child are dead. Although there is plenty of written material
available, there is simply not enough to add meat to the bones, so to speak. Even worse is Mrs. Beale. She was the wife of Mr. Beale, noted in Inglis as an "overseer of roads", he was shot on July 11th wounded in the back from a a rifle shot and died a week later. According to Wilson, there is a Mrs. Beale with no children. However, Julia Inglis refers to a Mrs. Beale, as being the woman who had appealled to her for milk for her baby. (Inglis, 14th August). In Hilton's 2nd Edition Tourist Guide to Lucknow and the Residency, Mrs. Beale is listed as having 2 children and the whole Beale family is dead. How many children were there?
Many infants born during the siege are not
recorded on the lists mainly because their birth and death followed one another
so quickly they simply did not make it to the final count. This is where the
journals prove to be infinitely useful – being written by women who were
preoccupied with the day to day grind of living, some babies do get at least a
mention. One of these sad tales is of the Clarke family:
Dying of smallpox, Mrs. Elizabeth Clarke was
one of the refugees of Gondah. Her husband who had been the assistant
commissioner of the district was killed and she arrived at the residency eight
months pregnant and carrying her 21 month old son Matthew Edgar, in her arms. Combined with
the grief of her husband’s death and her oncoming confinement Mrs. Clarke had
very few reserves to draw upon. During
her illness she became delirious, alternately calling on her servants to bring
her dhoolie, then requesting her friend, Mrs. Bartrum to help her pack as she
“was going on a long journey” and reciting random Bible verses. After three
days, she died. Unable to name her baby who was born two days before her death,
it was named Elizabeth by Reverend Harris and duly baptized. The baby died,
only 5 days old. Her son died soon after.
I have made an effort to collect all the names I could find in regard to the original garrison at Lucknow, present during the siege. I did this really for myself as I needed to see the people whose history I have chosen to write about. The list is not complete as I have only come up with 660 entries, give or take a few, but at least the garrison has a face. It is difficult to remember people as being flesh and blood when they died so long ago - but give them a name, an event and slowly they begin to take form.
|
Edward Hilton |
|
The grave of Mr. William Marshall, Opium Contractor, and his mother-in-law, Anne Sanson. |
|
The Allnutt family |
|
The grave of the Reverend Polehampton |
|
Neill and the 1st Madras Fusiliers |
|
The grave of Charles Robert John Morgan |
*I use the word Native, as a direct transcription and it should be read in context of the times and ist not intended in any possible way as a slur. This will always be a point of contention between students of colonialism and our modern brethren - political correctness was not a problem for Victorian authors, simply because it had not been invented to our modern standards at that time - I choose to use the words of the original authors, after all, these are their journals and a memory of their times, not mine.